Value, Worth, and Company Sale Strategy
An obvious objective for the seller of a company is to maximize the company’s sale price. While securing the highest price possible in an M&A deal requires the alignment of many different factors, such as market conditions, sale timing and of course speaking with motivated buyers, two related concepts that have an important impact on deal terms are value and worth. An understanding of these concepts can significantly increase the probability of a successful company sale process.
The Difference between Value and Worth
While the words “value” and “worth” are often used interchangeably, in the financial context they mean different things. The value of an item refers to the price for an asset that a reasonable buyer and a reasonable seller would agree to in an arms’ length transaction. This price is generally derived by one of several commonly used valuation approaches, such as the asset approach, the market approach or the income approach. Worth, on the other hand, is a price that a person would be willing to pay for an item regardless of what its value might be. This amount may be significantly more or significantly less than the item’s market value.
To provide an example, the market value of a sweater may be 10 dollars, but if you are cold you may be willing to pay much more for it. The important thing to note is that this does not mean that the value of the sweater is more than 10 dollars: it means that, at a particular time, the sweater was worth more than 10 dollars to you. If the temperature were to rise, your willingness to pay more for the sweater than its market value would likely sharply fall. Similarly, you may be willing to give the same sweater away for a fraction of its market value because you have decided that red and blue polka dots are no longer your color scheme of choice or you want to free up closet space for Spring clothing.
Value and Worth in the Company Sale Context
Of course, concepts of value and worth are always present in company sale negotiations. In theory, both the buyer and seller should approach the issue of a company’s value from a market-derived valuation perspective, but the reality of deal negotiations is often not so straight forward.
Sellers. Sellers, for example, at times approach the sale of a company from the perspective of what the company is worth to them rather than what a reasonable valuation of the company would be. Of course a seller is free to value a company at any price, but the more an expected price deviates from a market-derived valuation the harder the company typically will be to sell. Sellers can also take the opposite position, where they assume that because market conditions are difficult or the company is losing money it does not have any value. In fact, companies that are losing money can be extremely valuable, provided that they have valuable assets or strong future growth prospects.
Buyers. Buyers also intentionally or unintentionally often confuse value and worth. When many buyers value a company they calculate the value by discounting the company’s future cash flows by the buyers’ “required rate of return”, which is just another way of saying what the asset is worth to them. Conversely, buyers may be willing to pay much more than the market valuation of an asset if the asset is vital to defend a company’s current market position, give the company a strong competitive advantage or for the company’s future growth.
Value and Worth in Company Sale Negotiations
Understanding the difference between value and worth is very important in company sale negotiations. The relationship between value and worth, buyer and seller negotiating tendencies and typical sale outcomes are represented on the following graph.
This graph outlines four potential negotiation posture quadrants, representing different possible combinations of worth and value. While the preferred position of the buyer is typically in quadrant 2 (where the buyer receives maximum value for something that is worth little to him) and the preferred position of the seller is typically quadrant 4 (where the seller pays minimum value for something that has high worth for him), there are natural market and negotiating tendencies for sale prices to fall within the circle at the center of the graph where worth is reasonably close to price.
Value and Worth and Sale Negotiation Strategy
The key strategic lesson that the four value and worth quadrants offer to sellers, of course, is to carefully search for potential buyers who will be motivated to pay higher than market-derived prices for a company or its assets. This may be because:
-the buyer benefits from favorable buying conditions, such as sudden liquidity or access to low-priced capital, that can be used to make an acquisition;
-the buyer needs to move faster than competitors to secure its market position and is willing to pay a premium for a quick deal closure; or
-due to synergies between the buyer and seller, the post-acquisition value of the company will be or can be made to be greater than its current market value.
Successful company sale strategy and negotiation depends on many different factors. While no single strategy or negotiation approach will work under all circumstances, being conscious of the difference between value and worth can help sellers identify buyers who are likely to pay the highest price possible.
If you would like to discuss a potential sale strategy for your company that helps identify buyers who may be motivated to pay more for your company than the amount that a market-derived valuation might suggest, please contact me at: firstname.lastname@example.org
This article was written by Darin Bifani, partner in our Santiago, Chile office. If you would like to know more about the difference between price and value when selling your company, take a look at THE VALUE OF NOTHING – HOW TO ACCURATELY CALCULATE A COMPANY’S VALUE.
The photo for this article was taken by Maxime Le Conte de Floris.